On Tuesday 23 May 2006 11:49, Stéphane Letz wrote: > Why do you do a static with libjack? I was thinking jack was > supposed to always be used with a shared lib version...
Well, what is the proper solution when distributing a binary? 1. Link libjack statically 2. Omit JACK support Just linking dynamically isn't an option. I want to fall back on another output if JACK is absent, not fail to start at all. I suppose there may be 3. dlopen libjack from within the program and continue if it fails I haven't tried that; is it a reasonable option? Chris
