On Fri, 26 May 2006 17:00:21 -0400
Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do you mean that you are sending one packet after 256 notes have played?
No I send one packet for each 1/256 note. Therefore only the timer needs to be
a realtime process and the actual software sequencers don't need to.
> In that case, I assume you are using it to periodically re-synchronize
> independant clocks. If that's the case, the local computer should be
> used to generate the MIDI clock according to its own clock. The local
> computer's own clock can then by re-synchronized periodically with the
> remote computer, which will automatically also re-sync the local MIDI
> clock signal.
>
> Does that make sense?
Well I didn't got this part right now, perhaps it's too late.
But I solved my problem.
As I send a packet with each 1/256 note to my software sequencers I was caught
in the thought about 1 tact so 256/256.
But this is not nessesary as I could send the midi clock independently with
just another integer as counter int the for loop.
I don't expect that you understand this right now, but I write this if another
person could have the same problem.
> Am I correct in understanding that MIDI is not being sent over the TCP
> connection?
No I use TCP to sync my software sequencers and want the midi clock to sync any
hardware.
Thanks for the help!
I should sleep right now.
Christian
--
I am not an Economist. I am an honest man!
-- Paul McCracken
