On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 17:53 +0100, tom christie wrote: > Sounds reasonable to me. > > Just to clarify, does that mean LV2_DATATYPE_FLOAT > would be #define'd as: "http://lv2plug.in/ontology#float"; > or something else?...
Yep. > I guess consistency would suggest using the same approach for both > slv2_port_get_class() and slv2_port_get_data_type(). Yeah, true. I'll give everything a look through and make sure it will make sense to do so in all cases (without mucking up the API too much). I'm a bit unhappy that it makes code longer and more messy though. The primary design goal here is to make host code as terse and simple as possible. strcmp'ing a string and then freeing it is quite a bit uglier than just testing an enum val :/ -DR-
