On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 08:44:25 +0200, Fons Adriaensen wrote: > All this doesn't change the fact that the rationale I commented on > *is* fake, whatever the qualities of LV2 (which I do not even deny).
I dont agree that it's fake per se, but I do think it was overstated. It can be /difficult/ to maintain binary compatibility, but it is rarely impossible, unless a really bad design decisision was taken.. - Steve
