On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 21:20 +0200, Pieter Palmers wrote: > Lee Revell wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 22:35 +0200, Pieter Palmers wrote: > >> Another strange thing is: why doesn't the tasklet finish, so that it > >> can be 'unscheduled'? I have my IRQ priorities higher than any other > >> RT threads, so I would expect that the tasklet can finish. Or is > >> tasklet_kill not-preemtible? that would be very strange as I would > >> expect that busy waiting on something in a non-preemptible code path > >> on a single-cpu system always deadlocks. > > > > When are you going to report this to Ingo + LKML + the other -rt > > developers? > > > After I do the printk testing to pinpoint the problem a little more > precise (as you suggested yesterday). > > However, I didn't feel like iterating through the recompile > kernel/crash/reboot cycle even more yesterday. > > Is there any underlying reason for this question?
Only that you seem to have found a bug in -rt and I'd like to get it fixed. Lee
