On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 15:07:13 +1000 Erik de Castro Lopo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > My own rather feeble first attempt is here: > > > > > > http://www.mega-nerd.com/tmp/sndfile.hh > > > > > > but I am not a fan nor a great user of C++. The wrapper should > > > really be written by someone with a love for the language. > > > > I use C++ a lot, and I gotta say, this wrapper isn't bad at all. I Well, it is very thin though. Which is not a bad thing at all. One could make ue of an arbitrary amount of more advanced C++ features if desired though (i.e. templates parametrized with the type you want to read for example, or operator<< and operator>> for reading and writing, etc.) > > prefer lower case method names, but that's about it. > > Oh, cool, a response at last :-). > > Well first off, it isn't quite complete and it hasn't been > properly tested either. > > Secondly, with regard to the method names, which do you prefer: > - OpenRead > - openRead > - open_read vote++, i never cared for the more java style methodName convention. > - something else > > Since you're the only person who actually responded to the real > meat of my email, I have to assume that you are the only person > on this list with a love for C++ and hence the only one who > should have any real input on this issue ;-). Nicely worded :) Flo -- Palimm Palimm! http://tapas.affenbande.org
