On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 23:52 +0300, Andrew Gaydenko wrote: > (sorry for crossposting - have tried at LAU mailing list, but have not got > any answer) > > Which kernel block i/o scheduler is most appropriate for JACK application? > There are alternatives: Anticipatory I/O scheduler, Deadline I/O scheduler > and CFQ I/O scheduler. I mean a kernel without RT-related patches. >
Should make no difference whatsoever for JACK clients - if they're written correctly, disk IO should not perturb them. CFQ is generally the best choice all around. Lee
