Robert Jonsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Saturday 27 January 2007 06:47, Loki Davison wrote: >> On 1/27/07, Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Hi All, >> > >> > I've been converting my old VST plugins over to LADSPA and have come >> > across something in the api which I really miss - the inability separate >> > the algorithmic to the displayed value of a parameter. >> > I'm finding this inability is leading to non-ideal programming habits. >> >> why are you coding new stuff for a depreciated system? Why not LV2? > > And why should you code for a plugin standard that nothing supports? > Besides, is LV2 even finished? > Suggesting that LADSPA is deprecated is a bit of a stretch. It may not be > perfect, but it's well supported. >
nothing? i'm aware of 3 hosts that can host lv2 plugins. maybe there are others i'm not aware of. -- Nedko Arnaudov <GnuPG KeyID: DE1716B0>
pgpZZNLIch0bk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
