On 3/1/07, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 05:41:49PM +0100, Robin Gareus wrote:
> he might be right. a random bot is more likely to spam
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] than [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> a compromise woud be la-user, la-dev , la-ann -
> or [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailing-list), etc. (but that's not catchy enough)
or lad, lau, laa as many of us tend to refer to them colloquially.
This solution is far too obvious. My brain simply refuses to consider this.
;-)
More seriously, I also thought of those. But [EMAIL PROTECTED] may
raise the same problems as [EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least for
dictionary based random spam if such a thing exists, and I have no
doubt it does).
Thought I admit that the most obvious alias for these lists would be
lad, lau and laa.
__________________
Marc-Olivier Barre,
Markinoko.
