On Tuesday 09 May 2006 10:59, Klaus Weidner wrote: > I think having a separate record type would be an alternative to the > "new_" (or "new ") prefix. If the record types are distinct, it would be > possible to use the same field names for current and requested object > properties.
I'd rather see the word "new" separated by a space so that searching is better/easier. -Steve -- Linux-audit mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
