Hey Steve / Amy,

In doing some tests, I've noticed that the USER_ROLE_CHANGE audit record is associated with both newrole, and semanage user -[ad]. I do not think that USER_ROLE_CHANGE is a good name to have associated with SELinux user creation/removal, not to mention that the payload of the record resulting from newrole looks nothing like the payload from that generated by semanage user -[ad].

Can we add a USER_ROLE_MODIFY, or some other label, that would indicate and differentiate SELinux user creation/removal from a simple newrole?

Thanks,
Mike

--
Linux-audit mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit

Reply via email to