> I am a little surprised that the "-a always,exit" doesn't cause an > error. I wonder if it works correctly - maybe auditctl code is smart > enough to overcome syntactic dyslexia? :) > given rules: -a always,exit -F arch=b32 -S adjtimex -S settimeofday -k time-change -a exit,always -F arch=b64 -S adjtimex -S settimeofday -k time-change
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# auditctl -l | grep timex LIST_RULES: exit,always arch=1073741827 (0x40000003) key=time-change syscall=settimeofday,adjtimex LIST_RULES: exit,always arch=3221225534 (0xc000003e) key=time-change syscall=adjtimex,settimeofday So it seems the auditctl code is able to get the intent right regardless of the order. LCB. -- LC (Lenny) Bruzenak [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Linux-audit mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
