On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:04:38 +0100 Al Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:15:50PM -0400, Eric Paris wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 10:11 +0800, zhangxiliang wrote: > > > When the "status_get->mask" is "AUDIT_STATUS_RATE_LIMIT || > > > AUDIT_STATUS_BACKLOG_LIMIT". > > > If "audit_set_rate_limit" fails and "audit_set_backlog_limit" succeeds, > > > the "err" value will be greater than or equal to 0. It will miss the > > > failure of rate set. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiliang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > man, it gives me the heebee jeebies with the coding style but it follows > > everything else > > Sanitized, applied, pushed to audit-current (audit.b53) That tree doesn't appear to be in the linux-next lineup. Fixable, please? -- Linux-audit mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
