On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Al Viro wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 06:24:40PM +1100, James Morris wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Al Viro wrote:
> > 
> > > +         struct {
> > > +                 uid_t                   uid;
> > > +                 gid_t                   gid;
> > > +                 mode_t                  mode;
> > > +                 u32                     osid;
> > > +         } ipc;
> > 
> > 'osid' should be converted into 'secid' someday.
> 
> Eh?  Do you mean the field name there or the actual output?  Either is
> trivial, of course, but the latter is up to userland folks and the
> former alone seems to be rather pointless...

I was thinking in terms of the kernel API, where 'secid' is the preferred 
name for security identifiers ('sid' being an SELinux-specific term and 
also conflicting with 'session id').  Given that it's exposed to userland, 
I guess it's too late.


- James
-- 
James Morris
<[email protected]>

--
Linux-audit mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit

Reply via email to