On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 15:14 -0500, Steve Grubb wrote: > On Wednesday 28 January 2009 12:44:27 pm LC Bruzenak wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 12:15 -0500, Steve Grubb wrote: > ... > > > I'm trying to avoid a lot of retry logic on the sending side, where if a > > failure occurs, we would truncate and resend until it passes. I guess if > > I were certain that 7K is always going to fit I could artificially clamp > > my own input there, but it seems better if it were universally constant. > > For the time being, you'll need to clamp your input to maybe about 950 chars. > In all the work I've done patching everything, I've never needed to send more > than 200 bytes or so. >
That's because maybe you have never worked on a MLS system where all cross-level cut/paste transfers were required to be audited in toto. :) I'll have to put in some retry logic on my end. Probably would regardless. LCB. -- LC (Lenny) Bruzenak [email protected] -- Linux-audit mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
