On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Steve Grubb <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Saturday, February 09, 2013 04:13:52 PM Laurent Bigonville wrote: > > I've a question about the embedded version of libev. Is there any > > particular reason you are shipping it? > > Yes, it has bug fixes in it. If you have ever dealt with upstream for that > project, then you know how difficult it can be to report bugs. > > https://fedorahosted.org/audit/changeset/679 > https://fedorahosted.org/audit/changeset/698 > > I know of one more bug that needs fixing in that library. > > >Or is it only for convenience? > > Nope. This one in particular breaks the build for audit: > https://fedorahosted.org/audit/changeset/679/trunk/src/libev/ev.h > > > > The Debian archive is containing already containing libev (4.11) and > > it's usually considered bad practice to embed libraries that are > > already contained in the archive. > > > > Would you accept a patch to allow building audit against the system > > libev library? > > Sure. But I want it to default to using the embedded one so there are no > regressions out of the box. > > Hem, apparently it is something someone doesn't like https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries, no ? > Thanks, > -Steve > > -- > Linux-audit mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit >
-- Linux-audit mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
