OK. So, in essence, the example I provided is a just poorly formatted event from PAM. Or rather, one that can't be parsed by the auparse library without loss of data.
TIA On Thu, 2013-03-14 at 06:54 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote: > On Thursday, March 14, 2013 09:21:30 PM Burn Alting wrote: > > As you can see, we have lost the 'password' element of the > > "op=change password" > > key value pair in the original event. > > > > Is this a feature or bug??? > > Its a feature. The only thing guaranteed by the audit system is that > name=value pairs are supported. Additional text may be there to add context > for people reading the event. But for machine parsing only name=value is > returned. So, if the additional text is needed, then either '-' or '_' can be > added between words (as many other events do). > > -Steve -- Linux-audit mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
