Hello, ----- Original Message ----- > Full replacement patch:
I'm still convinced that icanon is not the correct condition, see https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2013-March/msg00052.html . > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/audit.h b/include/uapi/linux/audit.h > index 9f096f1..a863669 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/audit.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/audit.h > @@ -369,7 +369,8 @@ struct audit_status { > }; > > struct audit_tty_status { > - __u32 enabled; /* 1 = enabled, 0 = disabled */ > + __u32 enabled; /* 1 = enabled, 0 = disabled */ > + __u32 log_icanon; /* 1 = enabled, 0 = disabled */ > }; Also, would it make sense for the user-space API to be more general about expressing the intent ("log passwords")? I don't know, being precise about the exact effect of the option is also beneficial. Mirek -- Linux-audit mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
