Sigh...I sent this back out from another emai address and got bounced from the lists... resending. Sorry for the cruft.
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 7:34 AM, William Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: > I sent out 3 patches on 12/2/2013. I didn't get any response. I thought I > added the right people based on get_maintainers script. > > Can anyone comment on these or point me in the right direction? > > RGB, Can you at least ACK the audit subsystem patch " audit: Audit proc > cmdline value"? > > Thank you, > Bill > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > William Roberts > Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 1:11 PM > To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: [PATCH] - auditing cmdline > > This patch series relates to work started on the audit mailing list. > It eventually involved touching other modules, so I am trying to pull in > those owners as well. In a nutshell I add new utility functions for accessing > a processes cmdline value as displayed in proc/<self>/cmdline, and then > refactor procfs to use the utility functions, and then add the ability to the > audit subsystem to record this value. > > Thanks for any feedback and help. > > [PATCH 1/3] mm: Create utility functions for accessing a tasks > [PATCH 2/3] proc: Update get proc_pid_cmdline() to use mm.h helpers > [PATCH 3/3] audit: Audit proc cmdline value > > -- > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to > [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM, > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . > Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]";> [email protected] </a> -- Respectfully, William C Roberts -- Linux-audit mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
