On 12/18/2013 01:07 PM, Tony Jones wrote: > On 12/18/2013 12:38 PM, Eric Paris wrote: > >> He made the change in the upstream repo, because that's what you need >> for certification purposes. Personally, I hate it, cause i don't give a >> hoot about that and would rather things to be consistent, but that's the >> rational. A certifiable audit needs what he has in the repo. If we >> ever get all of the credential data available to systemd it can be >> reverted... > > This doesn't really make a lot of sense as a certifiable audit presumably > also needs the local Fedora specific changes to systemd, which are not in the > upstream systemd repo. So I'd have thought the Fedora specific audit > package was a perfectly suitable location for the audit changes rather than > the main audit svn repo.
OIC, you were talking purely of the addition of the RefuseManualStop=yes, Sorry, I was talking more about the presence of utility scripts in the svn repo that are Fedora specific since they rely on Fedora systemd extensions. Anyhow, as I said, not a big deal. Thanks for reply. -- Linux-audit mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
