On 14/04/08, Burn Alting wrote: > Richard, Hi Burn,
> As you will see in the forwarded e-mail for the kernel team to accept > patches it will need .... > > --- Comment #1 from Alan <[email protected]> --- > Please see Documentation/SubmittingPatches > > We don't accept patches via Bugzilla, as we need a Signed-off-by > trail and discussion. > > > Based on your comment in > https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2014-April/msg00034.html > > which mentions you will add the patches to your tree, do I just ignore > this 'rejection' and the patches will come in from yourself? Correct. I'll massage it a bit to give it a better title, test compile it, sign it off. I'll run it through scripts/checkpatch.pl. > Should I add a comment to respond to Alan to that effect in bugzilla? Sure, if you like, that won't hurt. > Thanks in advance > > Burn > Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 09:54:34 +0000 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Bug 73511] Invalid arguments passed to audit_log_string() routine > resulting in embedded spaces in op= values > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73511 > > Alan <[email protected]> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |[email protected] > > --- Comment #1 from Alan <[email protected]> --- > Please see Documentation/SubmittingPatches > > We don't accept patches via Bugzilla, as we need a Signed-off-by trail and > discussion. > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug. - RGB -- Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]> Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat Remote, Ottawa, Canada Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545 -- Linux-audit mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
