Sorry for the long delay in getting back.

On May 6, 2014, at 10:55 AM, Steve Grubb <[email protected]> wrote:

> Out of curiosity, why don't you use auparse to write your BSM
> reformatter?

(1) I hadn’t run across the code repository until after you had mentioned it 
(I’ve only been actively looking at Linux auditing for a few weeks), and (2) I 
am still very much in the learning phase, trying to figure out what is in the 
data, what type of configuration I would like, etc. 


I will take a look at auparse soon. I am particularly interested in 
performance. My first parsing effort is *way* too slow. I use C++ regex a lot, 
and that seems to be a problem.

If anyone is interested is seeing Linux audit data (along with BSM) on a Mac, I 
posted a blog entry along with a little video:

        Analyzing Linux Audit Data
        http://www.toddheberlein.com/blog/2014/5/13/analyzing-linux-audit-data

> We will likely be needing to make changes soon and it would insulate you from 
> those kinds of issues.

Can I ask what type of changes and what is motivating the changes?


Thanks,

Todd


--
Linux-audit mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit

Reply via email to