On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net> wrote: >> >> Hmm. It seems that it didn't make it into Linus' tree. Crap. > > I assume that if there is a maintainer who normally sends me stuff by > git, when I see patches in emails they are just informational > heads-ups about stuff that is being discussed or pending, and that > I'll see it later in a pull request. So I just ignore them unless I > have specific comments, since clearly the emailed patch is just > informational and/or for comments/acks from others. > > The exception is unless it *VERY CLEARLY* says otherwise (as in > "Linus, can you please take this directly due to xyz"). > > Because why would somebody send me a patch series sometimes, and git > trees at other times? That would just be stupid.
In this particular case, it's my patch, and I've never sent you a pull request. I sort of assumed that secur...@kernel.org magically caused acknowledged fixes to end up in your tree. I'm not sure what I'm supposed to do here. Maybe the confusion is because Eric resent the patch? --Andy -- Linux-audit mailing list Linux-audit@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
