On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Richard Guy Briggs <r...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 15/05/14, Paul Moore wrote: >> * Look at our existing audit records to determine which records should have >> namespace and container ID tokens added. We may only want to add the >> additional fields in the case where the namespace/container ID tokens are not >> the init namespace. > > If we have a record that ties a set of namespace IDs with a container > ID, then I expect we only need to list the containerID along with auid > and sessionID.
The problem here is that the kernel has no concept of a "container", and I don't think it makes any sense to add one just for audit. "Container" is a marketing term used by some userspace tools. I can imagine that both audit could benefit from a concept of a namespace *path* that understands nesting (e.g. root/2/5/1 or something along those lines). Mapping these to "containers" belongs in userspace, I think. --Andy -- Linux-audit mailing list Linux-audit@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
