On Wednesday, August 12, 2015 11:19:44 AM Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > On 15/08/12, Paul Moore wrote: > > On Wednesday, August 12, 2015 05:48:48 AM Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > > > Do you plan to push this fix to next? > > > > Patience. Yes, I'll be pushing this to next sometime this week; as usual > > I'll send mail when I do. > > Ok, no problem, I'm not rushing. I was unsure what your intentions were > or whether there was more to do to help it happen.
It's merged. I still don't know why I'm seeing that error, but the patch is obviously correct so I'm just going to merge it anyway and chalk it up to some compiler/sparse oddity. As far as patch follow-ups, if you haven't heard back from me after four days or so (yes, that is as arbitrary as it sounds), it isn't a bad idea to send a follow-up, especially if it is a critical patch, to make sure I've seen the patch (things do occasionally fall through the cracks). However, if it is only been a day or two and I haven't responded, rest assured I've likely seen your patch I'm just dealing with something else at the moment and haven't had the time to review/comment/merge your patch. -- paul moore security @ redhat -- Linux-audit mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
