On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Paul Moore <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Paul Moore <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Paul Moore <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Paul Moore <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> From: Paul Moore <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> Cong Wang correctly pointed out that the RCU read locking of the >>>> auditd_connection struct was wrong, this patch correct this by >>>> adopting a more traditional, and correct RCU locking model. >>>> >>>> This patch is heavily based on an earlier prototype by Cong Wang. >>>> >>>> [XXX: Cong Wang, as mentioned previously, I'd like to add your >>>> sign-off; please let me know if that is okay with you.] >>>> >>>> Cc: <[email protected]> # 4.11.x-: 264d509637d9 >>>> Reported-by: Cong Wang <[email protected]> >>>> ??!! -> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <[email protected]> >>>> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <[email protected]> >>>> --- >>>> kernel/audit.c | 157 >>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- >>>> 1 file changed, 100 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-) >>> >>> A quick note that I haven't tested this yet, I'm in the process of >>> building a kernel now, I just wanted to send this out early to in case >>> anyone noticed anything incredibly stupid. >> >> I've booted the patch a few times, and run audit-testsuite and >> selinux-testsuite against it without problem. I'm currently hitting >> the system with a constant stream of audit records while I restart the >> audit daemon every five seconds, ~15m and everything still appears to >> be working correctly. >> >> In case anyone wants to play with a Fedora kernel build, you can get a >> pre-built binary here for x86_64: >> >> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pcmoore/kernel-testing/build/544810 > > Cong Wang, have you had a chance to look at the patch yet? As I said, > I'd like to include your sign-off ...
Sorry for the delay. I don't have time to look into the rewritten patch from you, but you can add my SoB since you said it is based on mine. Thanks. -- Linux-audit mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
