> On Fri, 7 Jul 2017, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 12:04:28PM +0300, Elena Reshetova wrote: > > > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be > > > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as > > > a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental > > > refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free > > > situations. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova <[email protected]> > > > Signed-off-by: Hans Liljestrand <[email protected]> > > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]> > > > Signed-off-by: David Windsor <[email protected]> > > > > I'll let tglx comment on the SoB chain, I know he likes those :-) You > > did Cc him right, seeing how he's the maintainer of this stuff.. > > Right, that SOB chain is crap. It suggests that the patch was written by > Elena and then carried on by Hans, handed over to Kees and from there to > David. And now it's resent by Elena. Circular dependencies or what?
I will fix SOB on all patches and resend. Best Regards, Elena -- Linux-audit mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
