Hi Steve, Thanks for pointing me in the right direction and including the 2 year old ticket to reference ;)
I will see about getting the audit.socket masked if it is allowed under FIPS/NIST. Thanks again, Brad On 10/17/2017 12:25 PM, Steve Grubb wrote: > On Tuesday, October 17, 2017 11:40:12 AM EDT Brad Zynda wrote: >> Hey Steve, >> >> No problem you guys are busy with updates.. >> >> So I kind of stepped into a known issue with a current disagreement >> between the 2 maintainers? > > Its not a disagreement. Its systemd wants to do everything. Its a crond/ > xinetd/syslogd/auditd/core dump collector/udev/login service/fstab/fs > automounter/container manager/file system monitor/resource manager/daemon > watchdog and oh by the way, it does init. > > >> what can be done to resolve this going >> forward as it is killing services in production environments? > > End users have to take the situation into their own hands. There are > configuration knobs for a reason. More info here: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227379 > > >> I agree with the need not to remove auditing as this is a slippery slope >> and should not occur but the decision was based on little documentation >> in regards to the problem and loss of service, I will look at further >> checking in hopes to find the specific rule. Though I think the latter >> to fix the issue is the appropriate avenue. > > Figuring out which rule is triggering is the best solution. It may turn out > you just have a busy system. But most of the time its a bad rule. > >> The rules have been put in place across many organizations that check >> with tools like CIS-CAT and OSCAP, so a lot of rules and a point of >> possible single failure. > > They make mistakes, too. > >> In regards to the audit.socket what is the expected outcome of masking >> this service? > > The expected outcome is that journald stops getting audit records. It doesn't > solve the problem of why you are getting so many events. Fixing the rule does > that. > > -Steve > >> On 10/17/2017 11:25 AM, Steve Grubb wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I apologize for the late reply...just found the message. >>> >>> On Monday, October 2, 2017 1:30:19 PM EDT Brad Zynda wrote: >>>> I am sending along an issue brought to the systemd-journald dev list >>>> initially: >>>> >>>> On 10/02/2017 11:40 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: >>>>> On Mo, 02.10.17 11:25, Brad Zynda ([email protected]) wrote: >>>>>> Sep 28 13:50:03 server systemd-journal[565]: Suppressed 73244 messages >>>>>> from /system.slice/auditd.service >>>>> >>>>> The question is: why does auditd even log to the journal? >>> >>> It doesn't. I have had many arguments with the systemd people about >>> polluting syslog with audit events. If we wanted audit events there, we >>> would have wrote them there. The journal is listening on a multicast >>> audit socket that was created just for them and using a posix capability >>> that was created just for them. And journal also turns on auditing even >>> if you didn't want it. In short, they have, with intention, created your >>> problem. >>> >>>>>> Now we are required to have full audit rules and does this look like at >>>>>> rate limiting issue or an issue of journal not able to handle the >>>>>> traffic to logging? >>>>> >>>>> journald detected that it got flooded with too many messages in too >>>>> short a time from auditd. if this happens then something is almost >>>>> certainly off with auditd, as auditd is not supposed to flood journald >>>>> with messages, after all it maintains its own auditing log database. >>> >>> No...that's the way it works. If you want the audit stream, you have to be >>> able to handle it. My suggestion is that we have a separation of duties. >>> Auditd has audit events, journal has syslog. Besides, mixing audit and >>> syslog data means the security officer and system admin roles have been >>> combined. I think there is an audit.socket unit file that can be masked. >>> >>>>> Please ping the auditd folks for help >>> >>> They created the problem of audit events in syslog. That said, its been my >>> experience that whenever you get lots of events, there may be something >>> wrong with your rules. >>> >>> The normal technique to figure out what wrong is to run aureport --summary >>> --key during the time range of the flood to see what rule is triggering. >>> Then we can look at that rule to see if there's something wrong with it. >>> >>> More below... >>> >>>> Hey Everyone, >>>> >>>> Not sure if this is a bug so: >>>> >>>> systemctl status -l systemd-journald.service >>>> ● systemd-journald.service - Journal Service >>>> >>>> Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/systemd-journald.service; >>>> >>>> static; vendor preset: disabled) >>>> >>>> Active: active (running) since Tue 2017-09-26 20:01:16 UTC; 5 days ago >>>> >>>> Docs: man:systemd-journald.service(8) >>>> >>>> man:journald.conf(5) >>>> >>>> Main PID: 565 (systemd-journal) >>>> >>>> Status: "Processing requests..." >>>> CGroup: /system.slice/systemd-journald.service >>>> >>>> └─565 /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-journald >>>> >>>> Sep 28 13:50:03 server systemd-journal[565]: Suppressed 73244 messages >>>> from /system.slice/auditd.service >>>> Sep 28 13:51:03 server systemd-journal[565]: Suppressed 98979 messages >>>> from /system.slice/auditd.service >>>> Sep 28 13:52:03 server systemd-journal[565]: Suppressed 109433 messages >>>> from /system.slice/auditd.service >>>> Sep 28 13:53:03 server systemd-journal[565]: Suppressed 99788 messages >>>> from /system.slice/auditd.service >>>> Sep 28 13:54:03 server systemd-journal[565]: Suppressed 111605 messages >>>> from /system.slice/auditd.service >>>> Sep 28 13:55:03 server systemd-journal[565]: Suppressed 111591 messages >>>> from /system.slice/auditd.service >>>> Sep 28 13:56:03 server systemd-journal[565]: Suppressed 107947 messages >>>> from /system.slice/auditd.service >>>> Sep 28 13:57:51 server systemd-journal[565]: Suppressed 32760 messages >>>> from /system.slice/auditd.service >>>> Sep 28 17:21:40 server systemd-journal[565]: Suppressed 210 messages >>>> from /system.slice/auditd.service >>>> Oct 01 02:16:01 server systemd-journal[565]: Suppressed 1333 messages >>>> from /system.slice/auditd.service >>>> >>>> journalctl --verify >>>> PASS: /run/log/journal/d28b0080ffe0432a974f36e4fb4bfa9b/system.journal >>>> PASS: >>>> /run/log/journal/d28b0080ffe0432a974f36e4fb4bfa9b/system@0d49221d68d04ef0 >>>> b95 d8203c5e96a46-000000000097f6c7-0005596b745b4d1c.journal PASS: >>>> /run/log/journal/d28b0080ffe0432a974f36e4fb4bfa9b/system@0d49221d68d04ef0 >>>> b95 d8203c5e96a46-000000000096a587-00055966f35ae59a.journal PASS: >>>> /run/log/journal/d28b0080ffe0432a974f36e4fb4bfa9b/system@0d49221d68d04ef0 >>>> b95 d8203c5e96a46-00000000009554f1-000559629c4cdb7e.journal PASS: >>>> /run/log/journal/d28b0080ffe0432a974f36e4fb4bfa9b/system@0d49221d68d04ef0 >>>> b95 d8203c5e96a46-0000000000940591-0005595e1811a2d1.journal PASS: >>>> /run/log/journal/d28b0080ffe0432a974f36e4fb4bfa9b/system@0d49221d68d04ef0 >>>> b95 d8203c5e96a46-000000000092b500-00055959f2de5ede.journal PASS: >>>> /run/log/journal/d28b0080ffe0432a974f36e4fb4bfa9b/system@0d49221d68d04ef0 >>>> b95 d8203c5e96a46-0000000000916479-0005595573137b74.journal PASS: >>>> /run/log/journal/d28b0080ffe0432a974f36e4fb4bfa9b/system@0d49221d68d04ef0 >>>> b95 d8203c5e96a46-0000000000901337-00055950d80cc3d8.journal PASS: >>>> /run/log/journal/d28b0080ffe0432a974f36e4fb4bfa9b/system@0d49221d68d04ef0 >>>> b95 d8203c5e96a46-00000000008ec2fb-0005594cad14b07a.journal PASS: >>>> /run/log/journal/d28b0080ffe0432a974f36e4fb4bfa9b/system@0d49221d68d04ef0 >>>> b95 d8203c5e96a46-00000000008d7373-0005594838683e58.journal PASS: >>>> /run/log/journal/d28b0080ffe0432a974f36e4fb4bfa9b/system@0d49221d68d04ef0 >>>> b95 d8203c5e96a46-00000000008c238e-00055943fe2072e3.journal PASS: >>>> /run/log/journal/d28b0080ffe0432a974f36e4fb4bfa9b/system@0d49221d68d04ef0 >>>> b95 d8203c5e96a46-00000000008ad1d9-0005593ff64a4f69.journal PASS: >>>> /run/log/journal/d28b0080ffe0432a974f36e4fb4bfa9b/system@0d49221d68d04ef0 >>>> b95 d8203c5e96a46-0000000000897f32-0005593e18c5758b.journal >>>> >>>> >>>> journalctl --disk-usage >>>> Archived and active journals take up 1.1G on disk. >>>> >>>> >>>> Initially we saw: >>>> 16733 PATH >>>> 5070 SYSCALL >>>> 5024 CWD >>>> 3765 AVC >>>> 323 CRYPTO_KEY_USER >>>> 223 USER_START >>>> 222 USER_ACCT >>>> 222 CRED_ACQ >>>> 220 LOGIN >>>> 220 CRED_REFR >>>> 218 USER_END >>>> 218 CRED_DISP >>>> 46 USER_LOGIN >>>> 12 EXECVE >>>> 4 USER_AUTH >>>> 2 CRYPTO_SESSION >>>> 1 USER_ROLE_CHANGE >>>> 1 USER_CMD >>>> 1 SERVICE_STOP >>>> 1 SERVICE_START >>>> 1 BPRM_FCAPS >>>> >>>> so we blocked type PATH in audit.rules >>> >>> This is not the right thing to do. If a security officer asks what is >>> being >>> accessed, you got rid of the information. The right thing is to figure out >>> which rule is being hit and see if something is wrong with it. For >>> example, I have seen people do this: >>> >>> -a always,exit -S open,openat -F exit=-EPERM >>> >>> The problem is that they did not restrict the rule an architecture and >>> they >>> were getting lots of events for the wrong syscall. I've also seen people >>> add -F success 0 to an open syscall. This also results in a large number >>> of events. >>> >>> So, I'd recommend making sure all rules have keys added and the running >>> the >>> key summary report to see what rule needs inspection. >>> >>> If you find the rule that's causing the problem and you want an opinion, >>> send it to the mail list. >>> >>> -Steve >>> >>>> But we are still seeing 100K of dropped/suppressed messages. >>>> >>>> Note: systemloglevel = INFO >>>> >>>> Centos 7 1708 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64 >>>> >>>> systemd.x86_64 219-42.el7_4.1 >>>> >>>> >>>> Now we are required to have full audit rules and does this look like at >>>> rate limiting issue or an issue of journal not able to handle the >>>> traffic to logging? >>>> >>>> Error we are seeing from services that have silently failed, in this >>>> case glassfish.. >>>> >>>> systemctl status -l glassfish >>>> ● glassfish.service - SYSV: GlassFish start and stop daemon >>>> >>>> Loaded: loaded (/etc/rc.d/init.d/glassfish; bad; vendor preset: >>>> disabled) >>>> >>>> Active: active (exited) since Tue 2017-09-26 20:01:36 UTC; 5 days ago >>>> Docs: >>>> man:systemd-sysv-generator(8) >>>> >>>> Process: 1328 ExecStart=/etc/rc.d/init.d/glassfish start (code=exited, >>>> >>>> status=0/SUCCESS) >>>> >>>> Warning: Journal has been rotated since unit was started. Log output is >>>> incomplete or unavailable. >>>> >>>> Eventually glassfish will fail but it wont kill the service so we never >>>> get an nms service down trap from the OID. >>>> >>>> Please let me know if further info is needed or if certain limits need >>>> to be adjusted. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Brad Zynda >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Linux-audit mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit > > > -- Linux-audit mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
