Warron, > Furthermore, where would I add the -i switch to a rule like this one:
You basically put a "-i" on a separate line by itself afaik somewhere at the top of the audit rules file. All the rules below the -i line will not cause a load failure (Steve and RGB can confirm). Farhan On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 8:49 PM Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2018-04-24 18:04, warron.french wrote: > > Furthermore, where would I add the -i switch to a rule like this one: > > > > -a always,exit -F path=/usr/bin/cgclassify -F perm=x -F auid>=1000 -F > > auid!=4294967295 -k privileged > > I'm not aware of any per-rule switches to permit failure to load to be > non-fatal. I was suggesting it might help in your situation to add such > a feature, but I think the better solution is a customized rule set for > each machine or type of machine. > > > ?? > > > > -------------------------- > > Warron French > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 6:03 PM, warron.french <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Mr. Briggs/Rafi, > > > > > > I don't see the -i switch even mentioned in the manpage for > audit.rules. > > > Is this a documented switch, or not yet a capability on Red Hat or > CentOS > > > systems? > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > > > -------------------------- > > > Warron French > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 11:14 AM, Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> On 2018-04-23 23:41, F Rafi wrote: > > >> > Adding a -i to the rules file should ignore any errors. > > >> > > >> At risk of feature creep, it might be nice to have a flag to ignore > > >> certain rules but not others, a way to tag individual rules with > either > > >> a must, or a different tag with "ignore if not present" for file > rules. > > >> > > >> > -Farhan > > >> > > > >> > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 9:19 PM, warron.french < > [email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > Hi, I have a requirement to monitor a ton of files, executables > and > > >> confug > > >> > > files. > > >> > > > > >> > > Anyway, not all of my systems have every file in the list; and > when I > > >> add > > >> > > the rules appropriate, either as a Watch (-w) rule or as an Action > > >> (-a) > > >> > > rule, the rules stop loading when the find a rule that has a file > that > > >> > > doesn't exist *on that particular system*. > > >> > > > > >> > > This is the intended effect, yes? > > >> > > > > >> > > Thanks in advance, > > >> > > -------------------------- > > >> > > Warron French > > >> > > >> - RGB > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]> > > >> Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems > > >> Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada > > >> IRC: rgb, SunRaycer > > >> Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635 > > >> > > > > > > > > - RGB > > -- > Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]> > Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems > Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada > IRC: rgb, SunRaycer > Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635 > > -- > Linux-audit mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit >
-- Linux-audit mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
