On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 7:44 AM Amir Goldstein <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 7:40 PM, Jan Kara <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > this series addresses the problems I have identified when trying to > > understand > > how exactly is kernel/audit_tree.c using generic fsnotify framework. I hope > > I have understood all the interactions right but careful review is certainly > > welcome (CCing Al as he was the one implementing this code originally). > > > > The patches have been tested by a stress test I have written which mounts & > > unmounts filesystems in the directory tree while adding and removing audit > > rules for this tree in parallel and accessing the tree to generate events. > > Still some real-world testing would be welcome. > > > > This sort of stress test sound really useful to fanotify/inotify as well. > Do plan to upstream that stress test?
Agreed. I would be interested in having something like this in the audit-testsuite so that we can include it in our regular regression testing. * https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-testsuite -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com -- Linux-audit mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
