On 2018-07-20 11:35, Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > This came about while trying to determine if there would be any pattern > match on contid, a new audit container identifier internal variable. > Thsi was the only one.
Yikes, my own typing needs a check... and I notice another spelling mistake in the following line "contition". > Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]> > --- > net/rfkill/core.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/net/rfkill/core.c b/net/rfkill/core.c > index 59d0eb9..e89a009 100644 > --- a/net/rfkill/core.c > +++ b/net/rfkill/core.c > @@ -494,7 +494,7 @@ void rfkill_remove_epo_lock(void) > /** > * rfkill_is_epo_lock_active - returns true EPO is active > * > - * Returns 0 (false) if there is NOT an active EPO contidion, > + * Returns 0 (false) if there is NOT an active EPO condition, > * and 1 (true) if there is an active EPO contition, which > * locks all radios in one of the BLOCKED states. > * > -- > 1.8.3.1 > > -- > Linux-audit mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit - RGB -- Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]> Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada IRC: rgb, SunRaycer Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635 -- Linux-audit mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
