On Tue, 23 Jul 2019, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 at 18:30:35 -0400, Paul Moore wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 6:01 PM Casey Schaufler <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > I suggest that if supporting dbus well is assisted by > > > making reasonable restrictions on what constitutes a valid LSM > > > "context" that we have a good reason. > > > > I continue to believe that restrictions on the label format are a bad > > idea > > Does this include the restriction "the label does not include \0", > which is an assumption that dbus is already relying on since I checked > it in the thread around > <https://marc.info/?l=linux-security-module&m=142323508321029&w=2>? > Or is that restriction so fundamental that it's considered OK?
Security labels are strings, so this is implied. -- James Morris <[email protected]> -- Linux-audit mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
