On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 2:43 PM Lenny Bruzenak <le...@magitekltd.com> wrote: > Paul, > > This change does seem to the untrained eye to be in line with the existing > FEATURE_BITMAP definitions. I appreciate your intent on not exhausting the > available space, but at some point if that happens is there any reasonable > way to expand? I'm sure you have some thoughts, or is this "it" as far as > features could go (the last available bits)?
I haven't given it a lot of thought, but I'm sure there are ways we could expand the bitmap if/when it is needed. I'm also sure it would be ugly; it almost always is a pain. My hope is that we've changed the API before then so it is a non-issue. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com -- Linux-audit mailing list Linux-audit@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
