Hey guys and thank you for the quick reply, Much appreciated! As Richard and Steve mentioned the commit: https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/commit/1b2263a807ca651f94517b1b22dc5f13e494984d Fixed this issue.
Any timeframe to when we can get a new version of auditd with that fix? Or should I count on redhat to release an update to the kernel ? Any update will be good. Once again thanks a lot! בתאריך יום ו׳, 6 בינו׳ 2023 ב-22:33 מאת Paul Moore <p...@paul-moore.com >: > On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 2:32 PM Paul Moore <p...@paul-moore.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 11:32 AM Steve Grubb <sgr...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thursday, January 5, 2023 10:41:49 AM EST Paul Moore wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 8:38 AM Ariel Silver <arielsilve...@gmail.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > I found the following bug: > > > > > > > > > > OS version = Red Hat Enterprise Linux release 8.6 (Ootpa) > > > > > Kernel version = 4.18.0-425.3.1.el8.x86_64 > > > > > auditctl version = 3.0.7 > > > > > > > > This mailing list is focused on the development and support of > > > > upstream Linux Kernels and Steve's audit userspace, we don't really > > > > provide support for paid distributions. If you are seeing problems > > > > with the upstream Linux Kernel or tools, please report them here, but > > > > issues with distribution kernels and/or tools should be sent to the > > > > distribution for support/assistance. > > > > > > Paul, we take bug reports and help requests from anyone. Often, > distributions > > > are how we first hear of problems. > > > > Steve, re-read what I wrote. > > > > This mailing list is *focused* on upstream work and support, and while > > it does not preclude talking about distro specific bugs, I believe > > there are better avenues for those discussions (e.g. see the RHBZ link > > I provided in my response) as upstream isn't really going to be able > > to provide adequate help for someone experiencing problems with a > > distro kernel which has a number of patches and backports. > > > > If you have a problem with this approach, perhaps we should move > > upstream development to an audit mailing list on vger.kernel.org and > > leave this list for RH specific issues? > > Steve, I realize it's only been ~24hrs, but should I assume you are > okay with that (the upstream focused approach)? > > -- > paul-moore.com >
-- Linux-audit mailing list Linux-audit@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
