On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:18 AM, Joseph Glanville <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Kent, > > Great news! > > Just wondering if the bcache tree has been updated or will apply cleanly > against 3.1?
It has, it's been rebased on top of v3.1. > I will test on some more exotic stuff (iSCSI, md devices, other custom block > devices etc) and get back to you if I find bugs. > Are bugs best reported here on the list or is there another best way of doing > so? Cool! The list and this email are best. > Willing to help out with some benchmarks on fast equipment that should be > able to stress bcache abit. Benchmarks are definitely welcome, the only benchmarking I've had time to do has been for specifically working on performance. Also, I mostly develop and test on 2.6.34 - I've done some stress testing of the 3.1 version but no performance testing, so it is possible there's performance bugs in the 3.1 version. Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
