On Sun, Oct 01, 2023 at 09:52:22PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 01, 2023 at 11:22:39PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > I'm not leaping at the chance to reorganize my fundamental data
> > structures for this.
> 
> Yeah, understood. Thanks for taking a look at it!
> 
> > Can we get such an escape hatch?
> 
> Sure, please use unsafe_memcpy(), and include a comment on how the sizing
> has been bounds checked, etc.

Thanks, I knew there had to be one :)

Reply via email to