On 01.11.23 06:18, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 at 22:24, Kent Overstreet <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 10:15:09PM +0000, Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink) wrote: >>> >>> The latest mainline kernel branch fails to build arm64 allmodconfig >>> with a native build on an arm64 host with the error: >>[...] >> Following patch should resolve everything: >[...] > Thanks, and I can confirm that fixes the build for me too on the arm hosts.
>> -- >8 -- >> From ad77f25f730ec9a0eb04be5adc591628654b85ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Kent Overstreet <[email protected]> >> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 18:05:22 -0400 >> Subject: [PATCH] bcachefs: Fix build errors with gcc 10 >> >> gcc 10 seems to complain about array bounds in situations where gcc 11 >> does not - curious. >> >> This unfortunately requires adding some casts for now; we may >> investigate getting rid of our __u64 _data[] VLA in a future patch so >> that our start[0] members can be VLAs. >> >> Reported-by: John Stoffel <[email protected]> >> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <[email protected]> > > Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <[email protected]> Kent, thx for handling this so quickly. If you want to do me a favor, please in the future include a "Link:" or "Closes:" tag with a URL to the report in cases like this, as explained in the docs (it's important for regression tracking, but also for future code archeologists); checkpatch should have pointed this out for this patch. Anyway, no big deal here, let me tell regzbot directly about the fix: #regzbot fix: bcachefs: Fix build errors with gcc 10 Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) -- Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.
