On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 12:10:22PM -0700, Thomas Bertschinger wrote: > On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 01:45:22PM -0500, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 10:55:09AM -0700, Thomas Bertschinger wrote: > > > I'm leaning towards keeping Make as the primary build tool for now and > > > perhaps a future patch can move towards using Cargo. But other opinions > > > are welcome. > > > > Let's hold off on that for now. > > > > I'm planning on pullling the Rust code in bch_bindgen into the kernel > > soon, and I want to see how that interacts with the kernel build system. > > If there's potential for commonality with the kernel build system, we > > might want to take advantage of that. > > > > (Also, if you're interested in that project, let me know! Getting that > > ready for the next merge window is a high priority item, but I have a > > lot of high priority items at the moment... :) > > Sure, I would definitely be interested in helping out with that. I don't > want to make any promises regarding timeline, since this combines two > worlds--Rust, and Linux Kernel development--that are both still very > new to me. But I can certainly give it an honest try :) as long as you, > or someone else experienced, can help with any questions I might run > into.
Of course :) Join the IRC channel - irc.oftc.net#bcache, we've got quite a few people acquainted with Rust there. The main thing that needs to be sorted out is that we require a patched version of bindgen (since rustc can't yet handle types that are both packed and aligned); we need to talk to the rust-for-linux people about whether they'll be ok with switching the kernel to the patched bindgen until we can get a proper fix into rustc.
