Values were left as the next possible sequence number when there were no
entries.

The fix involves updating the last_seq initial value and
setting last_empty_seq to cur_seq - 1.

Reported-by: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Camila Alvarez <[email protected]>
---
 fs/bcachefs/journal.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/journal.c b/fs/bcachefs/journal.c
index adec8e1ea73e..3835c458eec9 100644
--- a/fs/bcachefs/journal.c
+++ b/fs/bcachefs/journal.c
@@ -1196,7 +1196,7 @@ int bch2_fs_journal_start(struct journal *j, u64 cur_seq)
        struct journal_replay *i, **_i;
        struct genradix_iter iter;
        bool had_entries = false;
-       u64 last_seq = cur_seq, nr, seq;
+       u64 last_seq = cur_seq - 1, nr, seq;
 
        genradix_for_each_reverse(&c->journal_entries, iter, _i) {
                i = *_i;
@@ -1256,7 +1256,7 @@ int bch2_fs_journal_start(struct journal *j, u64 cur_seq)
        }
 
        if (!had_entries)
-               j->last_empty_seq = cur_seq;
+               j->last_empty_seq = cur_seq - 1;
 
        spin_lock(&j->lock);
 
-- 
2.34.1


Reply via email to