Any chance of getting this patch merged upstream? I've been running with it on my system (and using the fideduperange ioctl fairly regularly) for a couple of weeks now with no issues.
Thanks, Reed On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 3:58 AM, Brian Foster <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 11:42:42PM +0000, Reed Riley wrote: > > On Monday, May 13th, 2024 at 5:34 AM, Brian Foster <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 12:20:12AM +0000, Reed Riley wrote: > > > > > > > By removing the early-exit when REMAP_FILE_DEDUP is set, we should be > > > > able to support the fideduperange ioctl, albeit less efficiently than if > > > > we handled some of the extent locking and comparison logic inside > > > > bcachefs. Extent comparison logic already exists inside of > > > > `__generic_remap_file_range_prep`. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Reed Riley [email protected] > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > Seems reasonable: > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Brian Foster [email protected] > > > > > > > > > Have you run any tests just to make sure there are no surprises? If not, > > > it looks like xfs_io has a 'dedupe' command that would make it easy to > > > run a quick test or two from the command line. fstests has a bunch of > > > tests in the dedupe group (which I presume this patch should now allow > > > to run on bcachefs) as well. > > > > I worked with Kent to run his CI tests against the patch > > (https://evilpiepirate.org/~testdashboard/ci?branch=bcachefs-fideduperange&commit=1945149c8d7549b924cd88f57f0cd938b3bb7125) > > and also used xfs_io to do some basic sanity checks. > > > > Ah, great. I threw this up on my test branch yesterday as well just to > see what happens. It looks like it enabled more tests (likely the > fstests that _require_dedupe), which is good to see. > > > Specifically, I sanity checked that: > > 1. fideduperange doesn’t dedupe if file content doesn’t match, > > 2. fideduperange does dedupe stuff when they do (according to filefrag -v > > reporting shared extents), and > > 3. That neither of the above operations changed file checksums. > > > > Makes sense. Thanks! > > Brian > > > I’d be happy to run more tests if anyone can suggest them? > > > > > > > > Brian > > > > > > > fs/bcachefs/fs-io.c | 3 --- > > > > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/fs-io.c b/fs/bcachefs/fs-io.c > > > > index 20b40477425f..4f513f22a66a 100644 > > > > --- a/fs/bcachefs/fs-io.c > > > > +++ b/fs/bcachefs/fs-io.c > > > > @@ -857,9 +857,6 @@ loff_t bch2_remap_file_range(struct file *file_src, > > > > loff_t pos_src, > > > > if (remap_flags & ~(REMAP_FILE_DEDUP|REMAP_FILE_ADVISORY)) > > > > return -EINVAL; > > > > > > > > - if (remap_flags & REMAP_FILE_DEDUP) > > > > - return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > > > - > > > > if ((pos_src & (block_bytes(c) - 1)) || > > > > (pos_dst & (block_bytes(c) - 1))) > > > > return -EINVAL; > > > > -- > > > > 2.44.0 > >
