On Sun, 25 Aug 2024 at 04:20, Kent Overstreet <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> - rhashtable conversion for vfs inodes
> - rcu_pending, btree key cache conversion
> + nocow deadlock fix
> + fix for new rebalance_work accounting

I'd have preferred to get a proper list. I edited something together.

>       fs/super.c: improve get_tree() error message

Ugh. Please use '%d' instead of '%i'. Yes, yes, we use both, because
some people seem to think that 'i' makes more sense. but %d is
*hugely* more common by over an order of magnitude, and '%i' only
makes sense for sscanf (and then has magic properties that it does
*NOT* have on output).

I've pulled this, but reacted to it because it was to generic vfs code.

            Linus

Reply via email to