Hi Carl, hi Kent, hi,

Carl E. Thompson - 21.10.24, 02:34:53 MESZ:
> > But you're complaining about an EOL kernel, where the issues have long
> > been fixed, so in this case there's just not a lot I can do. I could
> > ask Greg to cut a new 6.9 release, but all the distros have been told
> > that 6.9 is EOL so it's not likely it would be widely deployed.
> 
> I am **not** complaining about an EOL kernel. I explicitly stated that I
> **didn't** need a fix. I simply reported a bug that affected me which I
> was unaware had been fixed.
> 
> I do think that if you find and fix a bug like that it would be nice for
> you to document it and let users know about it so we can possibly avoid
> wasting a lot of our time and effort unnecessarily.

Apparently there has been quite the misunderstanding here?

Kent understood "user demands a fix in EOL kernel" and you, the user, 
thought you said "user does not demand a fix in EOL kernel"?

If so… it might be important to understand misunderstanding each other can 
happen, especially in written language without body language and voice 
tonality. And that there (often or even always) is a difference between 
what one sends out and the other one receives… and how they receive it. 
And no one is at fault about that. It is just the way we are all different, 
have different internal maps of what we call reality and can understand the 
very same sentence in a different way.

-- 
Martin



Reply via email to