On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 08:55:32PM +0530, Manas via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Manas <[email protected]>
> 
> The syzkaller bug triggers BUG_ON assertions in
> __bch2_dev_btree_bitmap_mark. btree_bitmap_shift is checked in
> bch2_dev_btree_bitmap_marked_sectors prior to this. But only one out of
> two assertions is checked. This patch adds the other as conditional.
> 
> Reported-by: [email protected]
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e8eff054face85d7ea41
> Signed-off-by: Manas <[email protected]>
> ---
> The syzkaller bug[1] triggers BUG_ON assertions in
> __bch2_dev_btree_bitmap_mark.

The validation in validate_member() just needs to be fixed (and why 57?
that should be a constant, not a magic number).

> 
> btree_bitmap_shift is checked in bch2_dev_btree_bitmap_marked_sectors
> prior to this. But only one out of two assertions is checked. This patch
> adds the other as conditional.
> 
> A previous discussion about adding conditional in
> bch2_dev_btree_bitmap_marked_sectors is here[2].
> 
> [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e8eff054face85d7ea41
> [2] 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
> ---
>  fs/bcachefs/sb-members.h | 10 +++++++---
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/sb-members.h b/fs/bcachefs/sb-members.h
> index 
> 762083b564ee5909071eb4235c3d5cd6e72ee519..3141791491928930a707a6a16579c6d2e11e3700
>  100644
> --- a/fs/bcachefs/sb-members.h
> +++ b/fs/bcachefs/sb-members.h
> @@ -347,12 +347,16 @@ void bch2_dev_errors_reset(struct bch_dev *);
>  static inline bool bch2_dev_btree_bitmap_marked_sectors(struct bch_dev *ca, 
> u64 start, unsigned sectors)
>  {
>       u64 end = start + sectors;
> +     u8 bitmap_shift = ca->mi.btree_bitmap_shift;
>  
> -     if (end > 64ULL << ca->mi.btree_bitmap_shift)
> +     if (bitmap_shift > 57)
> +             return true;
> +
> +     if (end > 64ULL << bitmap_shift)
>               return false;
>  
> -     for (unsigned bit = start >> ca->mi.btree_bitmap_shift;
> -          (u64) bit << ca->mi.btree_bitmap_shift < end;
> +     for (unsigned bit = start >> bitmap_shift;
> +          (u64) bit << bitmap_shift < end;
>            bit++)
>               if (!(ca->mi.btree_allocated_bitmap & BIT_ULL(bit)))
>                       return false;
> 
> ---
> base-commit: 42f7652d3eb527d03665b09edac47f85fb600924
> change-id: 20241022-fix-missing-cond-bcachefs-a889f51e8aa2
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Manas <[email protected]>
> 
> 

Reply via email to