On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 11:00:20PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sat, Mar 15, 2025 at 02:41:33PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > That's the sort of thing that process is supposed to avoid. To be clear, > > you and Christoph are the two reasons I've had to harp on process in the > > past - everyone else in the kernel has been fine.
... > In this case you very clearly misunderstood how the FUA bit works on > reads (and clearly documented that misunderstanding in the commit log). FUA reads are clearly documented in the NVME spec. As for the rest, I'm juts going to ignore the ranting.
