New data types might be added later, so we don't want to disallow
unknown data types - that'll be a compatibility hassle later. Instead,
ignore them.

Reported-by: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <[email protected]>
---
 fs/bcachefs/backpointers.c | 10 +++++++---
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/backpointers.c b/fs/bcachefs/backpointers.c
index 8da1b68821a0..20c497f0c2cb 100644
--- a/fs/bcachefs/backpointers.c
+++ b/fs/bcachefs/backpointers.c
@@ -784,7 +784,7 @@ enum alloc_sector_counter {
        ALLOC_SECTORS_NR
 };
 
-static enum alloc_sector_counter data_type_to_alloc_counter(enum bch_data_type 
t)
+static int data_type_to_alloc_counter(enum bch_data_type t)
 {
        switch (t) {
        case BCH_DATA_btree:
@@ -796,7 +796,7 @@ static enum alloc_sector_counter 
data_type_to_alloc_counter(enum bch_data_type t
        case BCH_DATA_parity:
                return ALLOC_stripe;
        default:
-               BUG();
+               return -1;
        }
 }
 
@@ -847,7 +847,11 @@ static int check_bucket_backpointer_mismatch(struct 
btree_trans *trans, struct b
                if (bp.v->bucket_gen != a->gen)
                        continue;
 
-               sectors[data_type_to_alloc_counter(bp.v->data_type)] += 
bp.v->bucket_len;
+               int alloc_counter = data_type_to_alloc_counter(bp.v->data_type);
+               if (alloc_counter < 0)
+                       continue;
+
+               sectors[alloc_counter] += bp.v->bucket_len;
        };
        bch2_trans_iter_exit(trans, &iter);
        if (ret)
-- 
2.49.0


Reply via email to