On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 05:21:46PM +0200, g2p code wrote: > On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 4:38 PM Kent Overstreet <kent.overstr...@linux.dev> > wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 04:15:18PM +0200, Gabriel de Perthuis wrote: > > > > > > Pretty printing of sizes could introduce spaces and break > > > the expected space-separated format. > > > > we shoudldn't be including spaces when we print human readable numbers, > > that's the bug... > > > I did a quick check, human-readable sizes from prt_human_readable_u64 also > lose some precision. > That's fine for dmesg and other reporting, but there need to be easy and > obvious > way to get the values back losslessly, I don't think /proc/mounts and > /sys/fs/bcachefs/*/options/ > should modify them.
Who's parsing /proc/mounts for the option values, though? That's primarily for human consumption, we have better ways of getting at that...
