On Fri, Aug 08, 2025 at 01:06:32AM -0400, Alex Galvin wrote: > Hi Linus, > > You've stated that you and Kent Overstreet will "be parting ways" in > this kernel release. I understand your words to mean that you will not > be accepting PRs from him starting in this release cycle, with the ban > continuing indefinitely into the future. Please correct me if I am > wrong. > > Could you clarify what you will be doing with the code that is > currently in mainline? If it is not removed, would you still merge > bcachefs code that was sent to the mailing list by someone else? Would > you accept that code even if it was written by Kent, so long as > someone else made the pull request?
Well, Linus has been talking about removing bcachefs from the kernel for a long time, he's made it quite clear that's what he wants to do. In the past the reasons were more that it was "experimental garbage". I would hope the user reports have finally silenced that for good; it has stabilized incredibly quickly for a modern filesystem. (We're now down to fewer open syzbot bugs than either ext4 or btrfs and the main bug tracker is nearly emptied out; we're well on track for a very solid release and the experimental label off in 6.18). Now, all the assertions are about how I don't work with other maintainers and there's a lot of other maintainers who want bcachefs deleted (along with talk about the need for public apologies, therapy, things of that nature); this on top of a page and a half rant about how Linus doesn't trust my judgement within fs/bcachefs during the recent private maintainer thread). But the assertions about all the other people I've been pissed off have been very light on details and don't seem to mesh very well; they seem like more an attempt to keep long dead disputes alive than anything else. Well, it's still his kernel, if he wants to remove it that's his choice...
