On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 11:02:24PM +0700, Aquinas Admin wrote: > > Exactly. Which is why the Meta infrastructure is built completely on btrfs > > and its features. We have saved billions of dollars in infrastructure costs > > with the features and robustness of btrfs. > > > > Btrfs doesn't need me or anybody else wandering around screaming about how > > everybody else sucks to gain users. The proof is in the pudding. If you read > > anything that I've wrote in my commentary about other file systems you will > > find nothing but praise and respect, because this is hard and we all make > > our tradeoffs. > > > Sure, of course. The problem is that Meta doesn't need a general-purpose file > system. And yes, and in general, Meta is not the kind of company that makes > technically sound decisions.
This is entirely unnecessary. > Has the problem with RAID5/6 (write hole) been solved in more than 20 > years of development? My understanding is that RAID5/6 v2, with the stripes tree, is intended to fix this (the same as how it works in bcachefs).
