On Thu 15-09-16 14:54:54, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> For filesystems that wants to be write-notified (has mkwrite), we will
> encount write-protection faults for huge PMDs in shared mappings.
> 
> The easiest way to handle them is to clear the PMD and let it refault as
> wriable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <[email protected]>
> ---
>  mm/memory.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index 83be99d9d8a1..aad8d5c6311f 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -3451,8 +3451,17 @@ static int wp_huge_pmd(struct fault_env *fe, pmd_t 
> orig_pmd)
>               return fe->vma->vm_ops->pmd_fault(fe->vma, fe->address, fe->pmd,
>                               fe->flags);
>  
> +     if (fe->vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED) {
> +             /* Clear PMD */
> +             zap_page_range_single(fe->vma, fe->address,
> +                             HPAGE_PMD_SIZE, NULL);
> +             VM_BUG_ON(!pmd_none(*fe->pmd));
> +
> +             /* Refault to establish writable PMD */
> +             return 0;
> +     }
> +

Since we want to write-protect the page table entry on each page writeback
and write-enable then on the next write, this is relatively expensive.
Would it be that complicated to handle this fully in ->pmd_fault handler
like we do for DAX?

Maybe it doesn't have to be done now but longer term I guess it might make
sense.

Otherwise the patch looks good so feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]>

                                                                Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <[email protected]>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to