There is one caller of blk_mq_map_queues() which already doing a GFP_KERNEL
allocation for ->mq_map so I don't see the need for GFP_ATOMIC later in
blk_mq_map_queues().

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
---
 block/blk-mq-cpumap.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq-cpumap.c b/block/blk-mq-cpumap.c
index 19b1d9c5f07e..7fc37f28b433 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-cpumap.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-cpumap.c
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ int blk_mq_map_queues(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set)
        unsigned int i, nr_cpus, nr_uniq_cpus, queue, first_sibling;
        cpumask_var_t cpus;
 
-       if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&cpus, GFP_ATOMIC))
+       if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&cpus, GFP_KERNEL))
                return -ENOMEM;
 
        cpumask_clear(cpus);
-- 
2.9.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to